Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,741 - 8,750
Fields v. Lake Correctional Institution
as 1:2026cv25881
Plaintiff:
Roderick Fields
Defendant:
Lake Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06824
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Putnam v. Hibbett Inc et al
as 2:2026cv01518
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Putnam
Defendant:
Hibbett Inc and Hibbett Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv01643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Estrada Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02901
Plaintiff:
Patricia Estrada Valencia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Taconic Maintenance Inc. v. Wallace et al
as 1:2026cv01644
Plaintiff:
Taconic Maintenance Inc.
Defendant:
Giorgina E. Wallace and GKW Enterprises LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
LAWRENCE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
as 2:2026cv00414
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Roper v. Warden
as 3:2026cv01261
Petitioner:
Talon Roper
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
