Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,781 - 8,790
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00870
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Magno v. Lorey et al
as 6:2026cv01651
Defendant:
Martin Whaley, Larry Lorey, Rey Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Magno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02229
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05549
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Kevin, et al.
as 1:2026cv02820
Plaintiff:
Travis Marcellus Davis
Defendant:
Kevin and Maintenance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2026cv02809
Plaintiff:
Isaac T Davis
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fees Transfer Act
Coble v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01854
Plaintiff:
Codelia D. Coble
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carr v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00872
Petitioner:
Quant'e A Carr
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06852
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
