Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,821 - 8,830
Toliver v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2026cv03113
Petitioner:
Lester Toliver
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fernando Garcia v. Nathan Gaughan
as 5:2026cv04384
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Southern Cayuga Central School District v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv09044
Plaintiff:
Southern Cayuga Central School District
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLF_L.H. v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2026cv09099
Plaintiff:
CLF_L.H.
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
S.J.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09107
Plaintiff:
S.J.02
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Monroy et al v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2026cv04887
Plaintiff:
Natalia Monroy and Zachary Schroeder
Defendant:
City of San Diego, Parking Enforcement Agent Alvarez, Parking Enforcement Agent R. Hoten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02438
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
