Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 911 - 920
Ghonim v. Boone
as 0:2026cv63092
Defendant:
Michael Boone
Plaintiff:
Abdel Moustafa Ghonim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02958
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02963
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02972
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00947
Defendant:
Kevin Mcclanahan et al
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv09638
Defendant:
Zachary Travis and Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katereen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Franks v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2026cv09634
Defendant:
Mulches, R Rodriguez, I Barajas and others
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonnell v. State of Iowa
as 4:2026cv00481
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Petitioner:
Andrew Bonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sivley v. Integrated Services of Kalamazoo
as 1:2026cv03132
Defendant:
Integrated Services of Kalamazoo
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Sivley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2026cv14252
Defendant:
LARISA PLOSHCHANSKAYA, WARDEN ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ESSEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO JARAMILLO RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
