Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1,861 - 1,870
RHYMER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01957
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RHYMER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
BEBLEY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01963
Plaintiff:
JASON BEBLEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
BARKER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01960
Plaintiff:
RICK BARKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
ADKINS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 3:2026cv00220
Plaintiff:
SHANE ADKINS
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GUFFEY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01961
Plaintiff:
TONY GUFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
nelson v. QSI, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02107
Plaintiff:
michael nelson
Defendant:
QSI, Inc. and Gregory Vernon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051 Personal Injury
Walker v. Harrah's New Orleans LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02101
Plaintiff:
Dodd Walker
Defendant:
Harrah's New Orleans LLC, Jazz Casino Company LLC and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gouge v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv01943
Plaintiff:
Megan R. Gouge
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02573
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
