Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal

Cases filed
Cases 1,891 - 1,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01267
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Askey v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp.
as 4:2026cv01439
Defendant: Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp.
Plaintiff: Quintin L. Askey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09821
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status
Duong v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv01109
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Defendant: Frank J. Bisignano
Plaintiff: Tin Hong Duong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ewing v. Cain
as 3:2026cv00972
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Burl Cain
Plaintiff: Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leshore v. Warden Rothwell of Otis Bantum Correctional Center et al
as 1:2026cv09807
Defendant: NYC Department of Rikers Island and Warden Rothwell of Otis Bantum Correctional Center
Plaintiff: Vernon Leshore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Mikal McCracken
as 26-3770
Defendant: Mikal McCracken, a/k/a Kal
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. Rodari Sam
as 26-3812
Defendant: Rodari Sam
Plaintiff: United States of America
Kevaughn Russell v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-3832
Respondent: Attorney General United States of America
Petitioner: Kevaughn Russell
US v. Michael Barrett, Jr.
as 26-4546
Defendant: MICHAEL ANTHONY BARRETT, JR.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?