Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,501 - 4,510
v. Walgreens et al
as 1:2026cv00278
Plaintiff:
Larnetta Hawthorne
Defendant:
Walgreens, Ethan Lane Nelson and Noah Keef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. SHERMAN et al
as 4:2026cv01248
Defendant:
SCOTTY LEE SHERMAN, JR, First LLC, Healthcare, Jane Doe Physician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Furrer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00472
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeremiah Furrer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keller v. Greene County
as 1:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard Keller
Defendant:
Greene County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Title VII
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02491
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NEW WORLD ORDER DAO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2026cv00659
Plaintiff:
NEW WORLD ORDER DAO and NEW WORLD ORDER HEALTH & WELLBEING
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
