Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 5,451 - 5,460
Boyer v. Holden
as 2:2026cv00872
Defendant:
Landon G. Boyer and Travis Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blanton v. Craig
as 1:2026cv00700
Petitioner:
Shane C Blanton
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00877
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Anna Stevens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McKiddy v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2026cv01856
Plaintiff:
William McKiddy
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hernandez-Venegas v. Mickletz
as 2:2026cv05081
Plaintiff:
Jorge Hernandez-Venegas
Defendant:
Carol Mickletz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WARD et al v. PORTIER, LLC
as 2:2026cv05087
Plaintiff:
AIMEE WARD and RAY WARD
Defendant:
PORTIER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
