Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 7,621 - 7,630
DiPaolo v. Avatar Partners Inc.
as 4:2026cv01620
Plaintiff:
Candice DiPaolo
Defendant:
Avatar Partners Inc. doing business as Total Med Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Spong v. Bostick et al
as 8:2026cv03308
Defendant:
Carl Mowry, Kevin Geigle, William J. Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Renee Spong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01356
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BATTLE v. THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
as 1:2026cv02339
Defendant:
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Plaintiff:
LATOYA BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Burnham v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv01609
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Martine Burnham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cerezo v. Magnit, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv03063
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc. and Magnit, LLC
Plaintiff:
Suki Cerezo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
