Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 7,661 - 7,670
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv50513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mohammed v. Egis BLN USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13344
Defendant:
Egis UK - Consulting and Engineering Limited, Younus Shareef, Mohsin Shareef and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eckman v. THE BOROUGH OF SEWICKLEY
as 2:2026cv02353
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF SEWICKLEY
Plaintiff:
The Most Reverend Mark A Eckman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Measures v. Mission: St. Louis
as 4:2026cv01873
Defendant:
Mission: St. Louis
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Measures
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schoenfeld v. Rofki LLC et al
as 2:2026cv06975
Defendant:
Patrick Manning, James Webster and Rofki LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Schoenfeld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
