Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,651 - 9,660
Lewis v. DCS Employees
as 2:2026cv00198
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Dalton Lewis
Defendant:
DCS Employees and Ethel Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Goins v. Fitzgerald
as 3:2026cv00432
Plaintiff:
Brittney T. Goins
Defendant:
Ta Kisha Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorison v. Skana Aluminum Company
as 1:2026cv01540
Plaintiff:
James Thorison
Defendant:
Skana Aluminum Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HAMILTON ET AL v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv00608
Plaintiff:
KELLY HAMILTON and BROCK HAMILTON
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Woodley v. Holloway
as 3:2026cv01289
Petitioner:
Earnest Woodley
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welty v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv03298
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Eugene Welty
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv03304
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lopez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
