Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,661 - 9,670
Tsapelas et al v. Garza Food Ventures LLC
as 1:2026cv05571
Plaintiff:
Marina Tsapelas and Brianna Junot
Defendant:
Garza Food Ventures LLC d/b/a Siete Family Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PURRONE v. DOE
as 1:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO PURRONE
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CMA CGM, S.A. v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2026cv10127
Plaintiff:
CMA CGM, S.A.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HILL v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv06791
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
