Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 181 - 190
West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc. et al v. McCuskey
as 2:2026cv00679
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc. and 350.org
Defendant:
John B. McCuskey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Warden
as 5:2026cv00680
Petitioner:
Taevon Young
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bautista Bonneau v. Warner et al
as 3:2026cv02325
Plaintiff:
Ryan Frank Bautista Bonneau
Defendant:
Chris Warner, Amy Joyce, Jim Diegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Voelker v. KKR Transportation LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00553
Plaintiff:
Olivia Voelker
Defendant:
KKR Transportation LLC and Kali Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03533
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05414
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Macklin v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv05421
Plaintiff:
Keyandrea Macklin
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Roby v. Doe et al
as 3:2026cv03367
Plaintiff:
DMarco Roby
Defendant:
John Doe and John Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Hancock County Illinois
as 4:2026cv04262
Plaintiff:
Kristen Barnes
Defendant:
Hancock County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
