Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1,221 - 1,230
Sharpe v. Kosinski et al
as 1:2026cv02254
Defendant:
Anthony J. Casale, Essma Bagnuola, Henry T. Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KYLE v. MICHAELS STORES, INC. d/b/a MICHAELS
as 4:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
HEATHER KYLE
Defendant:
MICHAELS STORES, INC. d/b/a MICHAELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rhodes v. Tazewell County Jail
as 1:2026cv01482
Defendant:
Tazewell County Jail
Plaintiff:
Makenna Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04593
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv07183
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03243
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07012
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyon v. City of Albany et al
as 6:2026cv02412
Defendant:
Benton County, Joshua Hall, Engle Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Maverick Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sartori Sr. v. FCI-Memphis
as 2:2026cv03477
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Memphis
Petitioner:
Theodore John Sartori Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
