Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 6,291 - 6,300
Dawkins v. Gragg et al
as 1:2026cv00217
Plaintiff:
Bakeer Dawkins
Defendant:
Sergio Gragg, FNU Lowman, Shane LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00839
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05981
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
(HC) Victory v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County
as 2:2026cv02631
Petitioner:
Michael A. Victory
Respondent:
Superior Court of Santa Clara County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Smith v. Thomason
as 1:2026cv05979
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinn v. Grizzly Auto Detailing Franchises, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02643
Plaintiff:
John Joseph McGinn
Defendant:
Grizzly Auto Detailing Franchises, LLC and Joshua Hagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(PC) Perez v. Olsen
as 2:2026cv02645
Plaintiff:
Jose C. Perez
Defendant:
Marilyn Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03458
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meeks v. Embassy Suites
as 3:2026cv01083
Plaintiff:
Dario Meeks
Defendant:
Embassy Suites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
